카페검색 본문
카페글 본문
-
Immune from Prosecution in the US, but Amenable to Prosecution in a Foreign 2023.08.24해당카페글 미리보기
is consistent with the English rule,37 which it interpreted as protecting a witness 30. Id. at 480-81. 31. 3SI F. Supp. 1080 (D. Conn. 1972). 32. /d. at 1083. 33. Id. at 1082. 34. Id. at 1084. 3S. Id. at 1082-83. Exceptions to the grand...
-
Constitutional Law Flash cards 1 2023.08.24해당카페글 미리보기
not so bound and may conclude that the decision does not truly express the state law. Kehaya v. Axton, D.C.N.Y., 32 F.Supp. 266, 268. State of Nature A hypothetical pre-political state in which laws would not be established, settled...
-
Chandler v. Fretag (right to counsel for each charge guaranteed) 2023.08.21해당카페글 미리보기
Criminal Act, at the time of petitioner's trial, permitted an oral accusation. Williams' Tenn.Code, 1934 (1949 Supp.), § 11863.5. It was subsequently amended to require the inclusion of the accusation in the indictment on the...
-
Cicenia v. Lagay (From when does the right to counsel apply?) 2023.08.21해당카페글 미리보기
communicate with counsel during the police inquiry did not deprive him of due process. Application of Cicenia, 148 F. Supp. 98. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 240 F.2d 844, and we granted certiorari to consider the constitutional...
-
Crooker v. California (no fundamental unfairness resulting from the denial) 2023.08.20해당카페글 미리보기
any listening in or recording devices." For statutes similar to the Kansas Act, see Colo.Rev.Stat.Ann., 1953 (Cum.Supp.1957), c. 39-1-1; Ill.Rev.Stat., 1955, c. 38, § 449.1; Vernon's Ann.Mo.Stat., 1953, § 544.170; Mont.Rev.Codes, 1947...
-
Escobedo v. Illinois(Miranda's precedent, but it is sixth rights, not 5th) 2023.08.15해당카페글 미리보기
They can't escape the noose. There is nothing that counsel can do for them at the trial.'" Ex parte Sullivan, 107 F. Supp. 514, 517-518. It is argued that, if the right to counsel is afforded prior to indictment, the number of...
-
12. BROWN MACHINE, INC. v. HERCULES, INC.(contract1) 2023.08.15해당카페글 미리보기
is invited and will conclude it.” ③ Maurice Electrical Supply Co. v. Anderson Safeway Guard Rail Corp., 632 F. Supp. 1082, 1087 (D.D.C. 1986); USEMCO, Inc. v. Marbro Co., 483 A.2d 88, 93 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1984). The general rule is...
-
People v. Martin (compare with Miller) 2023.08.12해당카페글 미리보기
v. United States, 62 F.2d 892, 895; Smith v. United States, 2 F.2d 715, 716; United States v. Strickland, 62 F. Supp. 468, 471; State v. Hawkins, 362 Mo. 152 [240 S.W.2d 688, 692-693]; People v. Exum, 382 Ill. 204 [47 N.E.2d 56, 59]; see...
-
Miller v. United States (must convey police authority and purpose clearly) 2023.08.12해당카페글 미리보기
District of Columbia for conspiracy to commit violations, and violations, of the federal narcotics laws. 26 U.S.C. (Supp. V) § 4704(a); 21 U.S.C. § 174; 18 U.S.C. § 371. The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit...
-
Draper v. United States (constitutionally reasonable informer) 2023.08.11해당카페글 미리보기
search and seizure were therefore incident to a lawful arrest, and overruled the motion to suppress. 146 F. Supp. 689. At the subsequent trial, that evidence was offered and, over petitioner's renewed objection, was received in evidence...