카페검색 본문
카페글 본문
-
[constitutional Landmark cases] Separation of powers 2022.11.10해당카페글 미리보기
short order. The act was challenged by constitutionality. Issue Can an act permit a president unilaterally amend or repeal duly enacted statutes by Line Item. Held No. Rationale It violates the presentment clause. A specific practice...
-
[Constitution Sum par1] 2022.11.08해당카페글 미리보기
specifically supported by Exparte Yong and Edelman, pendent jurisdiction, (Siler: give the state right to modify and repeal) and ultra vires doctrine. The 11th Amendment prohibits a state (or state officials) from being sued in federal...
-
10/6(Thu) Discussion 2022.09.30해당카페글 미리보기
joins.com/2022/08/06/why/Korea-death-penalty-constitution/20220806070010230.html [WHY] Is it time for Korea to repeal the death penalty? Korea is officially pro-capital punishment, but no one has actually been put to death for...
-
한국 27위 ,,,,미국 41위 - 개발도상국가 수준 2022.09.17해당카페글 미리보기
pronounced for African Americans. Such differences have persisted well beyond the demise of chattel slavery and the repeal of Jim Crow laws. Scholar W.E.B. Du Bois first exposed this kind of structural inequality in his 1899 analysis of...
-
[corporation] In re Whatley 2022.09.08해당카페글 미리보기
states: The initial bylaws of a corporation shall be adopted by its board of directors. The power to alter, amend or repeal the bylaws or adopt new bylaws shall be vested in the board of directors unless reserved for the shareholders by...
-
[US Constitution] Marbury v. Madison // Ex parte McCardle 2022.09.05해당카페글 미리보기
is the US Constitution. However, it seems like the appellate jurisdiction is derived from Congress. Congress can repeal the action but the judicial branch will review the repeal. This case has a severe short-coming flaw. Habeas Corpus is...
-
[Constitution] – Ex Parte McCardle 2022.09.02해당카페글 미리보기
at all without jurisdiction, the court cannot pronounce judgment in this case. The Congress’s withdrawal or the repeal of the Habeas Corpus Act in 1868 does not affect the jurisdiction which was previously exercised. 피드백은 라이브...
-
[constitutional Law] Sherbert v. Verner 2022.08.26해당카페글 미리보기
form or scheme of unemployment compensation. (We here just make exception to the general rule. The state need not repeal or amend their law) Our holding today is only that South Carolina may not constitutionally apply the eligibility...
-
해외언론동향 2022.08.24해당카페글 미리보기
Malaysia's disgraced former prime minister is going to prison Economist Singapore Ups Ante for Top Global Talent, to Repeal Male-Sex Law Bloomberg The problem with Biden's EV subsidy: hardly any cars will qualify FT The reinvention of...
-
[constitution] Pennhurst State Sch. v. Halderman 2022.08.15해당카페글 미리보기
of the States. Siler directs the federal court to turn first to state law, which the State is free to modify or repeal. By leaving the policy determinations underlying injunctive relief in the hands of the State, the Court of Appeals...