카페검색 본문
카페글 본문
-
2024.4.7._주일축복예배_설교문_19_KSN-14[21주_복음_설교_프로젝트]-복음인설교6_왜_구원받아야_하는가 2024.04.07해당카페글 미리보기
without omission sometimes to day every day and put in big influence in the world church. “Now in Christ, no matter what I do, the Lord's love for me is not diminished. All I need to enjoy eternal joy is the Lord, and I will do to...
-
Agency & Partnership 1-14 2024.03.14해당카페글 미리보기
of error, and they are overruled. 5. Conclusion The interests of the Cities of Austin and San Antonio in the properties comprising the South Texas Project are exempt from ad valorem taxation under Article XI, Section 9, of the...
-
[Contracts II ]Wil-Fred’s, Inc. v. Metropolitan Sanitary Dist. 2024.02.22해당카페글 미리보기
the error was material. This determination is based on the fact that the $ 150,000 mistake represents approximately 17% of Wil-Fred's bid. See People ex rel. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. South East National Bank. However...
-
[FRCP] McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp (Is Wyler v. Tripi overturned?) 2023.10.05해당카페글 미리보기
was error; they argue that even though the Pennsylvania statute "borrows" the law of Ohio regarding the length of the applicable limitations period, the question when that limitations period begins to run must be determined not by Ohio...
-
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938) 2023.09.20해당카페글 미리보기
an error, so the case was sent back for further proceedings. MR. JUSTICE REED. I concur in the conclusion reached in this case, in the disapproval of the doctrine of Swift v. Tyson, and in the reasoning of the majority opinion except...
-
Boyd v. United States (Justice Bradley anticipated exclusionary rule) 2023.08.16해당카페글 미리보기
or omission, shall for each offence be fined in any sum not exceeding $5,000 nor less than $50, or be imprisoned for any time not exceeding two years, or both; and, in addition to such fine, such merchandise shall be forfeited. The...
-
BookStudyVol I : I Constitutional Interpretation and Judicial Power 2023.08.06해당카페글 미리보기
or omission. Driggers v. State, 137 Fla. 182, 188 So. 118, 120. A second prosecution after a first trial for the same offense. People ex rel. Rozea v. Warden of Queens County Jail, 43 N.Y.S.2d 211, 213. EO NOMINE. Lat. Under that name...
-
[Criminal Law] State v. Carlson 2023.06.27해당카페글 미리보기
jury on the matter of intent. He points to no misstatement nor material omission. We have reviewed the portions of the instructions which dealt with this matter and find no error prejudicial to defendant. The jury must be informed of the...
-
[Evidence] US v. Barrett (+ assignment) 2023.06.22해당카페글 미리보기
the omission of the single limiting instruction He, therefore, waived any objection. 수업 후반부에 룰804(b)(3)에 적용되기위해 누가 입증 해야 하고 어느 수준으로 입증 해야 하는지에 대하여 과제가 주어진 것으로 알고 있는데 해당 룰에 대한...
-
[Criminal Law] 8. State v. Carlson 2023.05.22해당카페글 미리보기
prejudicial error to exclude testimony of Dr. Davis concerning the results of the electroencephalographic tests? No. (probate value 없었다. D의 환경은 irresistible impulses를 일으키기도 한다는 증언이었는데, 중요한 lack of ability to...